By U Khin Maung Myint
Human beings have spent thousands of years trying to understand suffering. We have produced scriptures, philosophies, universities, libraries and, more recently, search engines. Yet suffering stubbornly refuses to retire. Religious traditions offer different ways of making sense of hardship. Islam speaks of Qadar, or divine decree, while also affirming human effort, prayer and responsibility. Buddhism approaches suffering through Dukkha, Karma, and the interaction of causes and conditions.
Christianity offers ideas including providence, free will, spiritual refinement and redemptive suffering. Psychology adds another perspective. Belief can help us make meaning out of adversity. It may protect us from despair, excessive self-blame and the frightening thought that suffering is entirely random. But every useful idea requires careful handling. Trust can become fatalism. Karma can be misunderstood as justification for blaming the sufferer.
Religious devotion can deteriorate into unquestioning obedience. Even scientific knowledge can become arrogance when human beings mistake knowing more for knowing everything. This raises an important question: where exactly does wisdom come from? “Wisdom, Wisdom, what are you?” Humanity demanded one morning.
“Where did you study? The Bible? The Quran? The Buddhist Canon? The Oxford Dictionary? Or perhaps the MRTV?” Wisdom arrived quietly, carrying no certificate. “Before you enter,” said Humanity, “we must verify your credentials. Which religion? Which university? Which organization endorses you?” Wisdom scratched its head. “I sometimes begin by saying, ‘I may be wrong.’” Security was immediately alerted. A scholar demanded references.
A preacher requested doctrinal clearance. A broadcaster offered Wisdom three minutes between breaking news and the weather. An influencer asked whether the whole thing could be reduced to fifteen seconds and accompanied by a discount code. The dictionary stepped forward and supplied a definition. Humanity immediately assumed that having defined wisdom meant possessing it. “We have sacred books,” announced the assembly proudly. “Excellent,” said Wisdom. “Do you practise their compassion?” “We can quote them.”
“That was not my question.” An elderly gentleman then rose. “Surely wisdom belongs exclusively to Homo sapiens?” Everyone nodded. On the windowsill, a cat watched proceedings with interest. It had eaten enough and therefore stopped eating. Another cat appeared outside. The first cat decided that fighting was unnecessary and went to sleep. Inside the conference hall, meanwhile, the humans postponed lunch to debate moderation and then quarrelled over who should chair the peace committee. “We possess extraordinary intelligence,” protested one delegate. “Human beings can split the atom!” “Can you share the bread?” asked Wisdom.
The chairman consulted his advisers. “That matter requires further discussion.” Faith, Cognition and Action Behind the joke lies a serious distinction between conviction and cognition. Conviction gives people beliefs worth holding. Cognition gives them the ability to examine those beliefs, compare them with evidence, recognize manipulation, reconsider assumptions and decide what action is proportionate. We need both meaning and thought. Faith may provide hope during suffering, but acceptance should not mean abandoning judgment. Devotion need not require surrendering conscience. Equally, rationality without compassion can become cold calculation.
Wisdom therefore cannot be reduced to education, intelligence, age or religious knowledge. Someone at the meeting suggested that age should automatically qualify a person as wise. Wisdom looked thoughtfully at human history and requested that the proposal be withdrawn. A university degree certifies study. A dictionary clarifies meaning. Sacred texts preserve generations of moral and spiritual insight. Journalism can inform us about events. Science helps us understand the physical world. But none of these can make the final moral decision on our behalf.
A person may possess knowledge without judgement, conviction without compassion, authority without insight, and intelligence without wisdom. Perhaps that is why wisdom is so difficult to certify. Before leaving the conference, Wisdom wrote three sentences on the board: Question your certainty. Consider the consequences. Learn from suffering without manufacturing more. The delegates were deeply impressed. They photographed the message, quoted it in speeches and circulated it on social media. The committee then unanimously agreed to establish a subcommittee to study the possibility of implementing it at some unspecified date in the future.
Wisdom quietly walked out. Perhaps that is the final irony. Humanity has accumulated an extraordinary library of advice about how to live, yet our greatest difficulty is rarely finding another quotation. It is converting understanding into conduct. Faith can give suffering meaning. Knowledge can illuminate its causes. Cognition can help us distinguish evidence from assumption and persuasion from manipulation. Compassion reminds us why any of these matters.
But wisdom must bring them together. It requires the humility to say, “I may be wrong,” the courage to change course when evidence demands it, and the humanity to consider how our actions affect others. Wisdom may have no certificate, no uniform and no exclusive membership card. Perhaps it needs none. Its qualification is demonstrated not by what we profess, but by what we do.
#TheGlobalNewLightOfMyanmar